REVIEW: SOCIAL/CULTURAL SECTOR
by Ermin Burnett
In this short paper
I examine the inter-relationship between the state, government and people as certain
social welfare services were introduced during the first twenty five years of Ministerial
Government
One may look at the
State from three perspectives:
individuals in
pursuit of their psycho-economic and political interest assign to the state mainly the
tasks of defence, judicial administration and certain public works.
in society the
individual can only be seen in terms of social and economic relationships, the dominant of
these being the mode of production;
human nature can
only be fulfilled within a community, that political authority is vital, that the state
must be interventionist and strong.
A summary of these
viewpoints defines the state as the social, economic and political organization which
establishes the basis for civil government, order, functioning and productivity within its
national boundaries, and directs its relationships with similar international
organizations.
The state is,
therefore, something more than Government. It is that socially accepted, ever existent,
self-sufficient authority which manifests itself in laws, bureaucratic form and machinery,
custom; it is that force of domination and control which justifies its existence and
actions as rooted in its philosophic and ideological concept of how human social, economic
and political organization should be.
As an international
personality, the state must have a permanent population, a defined territory, a
government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. (Clearly the
Virgin Islands cannot be defined as a state since it must depend on Britian to exercise
its capacity to enter into, on its behalf, relations with other states).
An analysis of
development in the Virgin Islands from Emancipation to date suggests that Virgin Islanders
perceive the state as needing to be strong and interventionist. In other words, that
Virgin Islanders tend to opt for organic-statism in the colonial relationship with
BritaIn, and indeed, tend to extend that perception of the body politic to its Ministerial
Government.
Perhaps to date,
the greatest demand made by Virgin Islanders on their State, was that of requesting
Ministerial Government--that established system of political administration which
prescribes that personal discretion is not allowed in administrative acts on subject
matter that has been designated to the elected individual.
A Ministerial
system, Virgin Islanders expect, would help them to realize their psycho-economic and
political needs, aspirations, and identity. Indeed, this to a great extent has been the
case in the social/cultural sector.
To date, the
responsibility for the social/cultural sector has fallen to three different Ministers.
When the
Ministerial system was introduced in 1967, the Virgin Islands had, for a few years, been
enjoying an economy into which tourism dollars had begun to flow. This increased level of
affluence, the greater flow of visitors and immigrant workers and the new sophistication
the society was developing, forged to bring to bear on the Minister' for Social Services a
demand for social services unheard of in the Virgin Islands. A prototype of the
inter-state-ministerial-citizen interaction to respond to such societal demands can be
sketched as such:
1. about the time that
the Ministerial system was introduced, branches from international civic service clubs
were coming alive in the Virgin Islands, and actively were identifying from the private
sector perspective social issues which they hastened to solve through their financial and
organizational initiative. Such clubs were well-balanced in their composition of native
and immigrant members.
2. the civic service
clubs involved the Minister for Social Services in a social service project by supplying
information on the concept, implementation and achievement. Therefore, the organic-statism
approach to social problem-solving was expressed through organized and socially accepted
avenues in the private sector. Projects such as Christmas parties for the elderly and
children, construction of houses for the indigent and overseas health care was undertaken.
3. birth was given to
a Department within the Public Service to carry out policies in regards to social
development.
4. staff from the
Department would meet with various youth, civic and church organizations to help identify
services youth and the general citizenry wished.
5. the express wishes
of the citizen would be conveyed to the Ministerial Cabinet, and when necessary, to the
Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs. Budgetary allocations would then be made for the
introduction of the requested programme.
6. citizens would be
encouraged to visit the Minister to express their concern on social issues and to propose
solutions.
7. concerned citizens
were invited to mobilize into self-help groups to attack identified social problems.
8. professional staff
of the Department formulated plans for social services in response to the needs identified
from a professional perspective.
9. professional staff
of the Department would work with other professionals involved in any aspects of social
development so that an inter-disciplinary approach to social planning could be used.
By use of the
organic-statism approach, social services innovation became the order of the day in the
public sector.
Here are a few
examples:
the annual summer
project to teach young people about tourism
the annual course on
Leadership
the employment
workshop for Handicapped youth
the farmer skills
project for Rastafarian youth
the reforesting
project on Gorda Peak, Virgin Gorda
self-help projects
such as the erection of the Carrot Bay Community Centre, the market place on Virgin Gorda,
the fisherman's cooperative on Jost Van Dyke the recording of Virgin Islands architecture
from Emancipation to the 1980's the training of youth in craft work such as batik,
jewelry- making and sewing
training courses in
music and drama
participation in
CARIFESTA
Today all of these
projects are vibrant in some form.
And yes, the
inter-state-ministerial-citizen interaction extended to Social Work. Counselling services
for every social ill were started, a home for the elderly and handicapped was established,
the prison administration and human services were improved. Citizens and elected
representatives ensured the passing of a law which assists any indigent.
Conclusion
Native Virgin
Islands society still holds a strong hegemonic bond, and seems to have transmitted to the
people who have come to live and work within the society, its views on how the state and
ministerial government should be involved in the life of the citizenry.
The Ministerial
form of government has serviced the organic-statism approach rather well to date, perhaps
mainly for these reasons: the population base is still small, personal and inter-personal
social intercourse is still rather fluid for class rigidity has not yet solidified, the
general perception of the citizenry seems to be that the standard of living for all has
improved thanks to cooperation between state, government and citizen, be he immigrant or
native.
The prototype
described was an excellent tool for attaining the objectives desired. I recommend
its refinement and continued use in all aspects of Virgin Islands development.
|