Beef Island
International Airport
Phase 1 Developments
PROJECT OVERVIEW
October 1999
Prepared by:
Airport Project Management Unit
Ministry of Communications & Works
Central Administration Complex
Road Town, Tortola
British Virgin Islands
1. Existing Airport
1.1 The existing
airport on Beef Island is the main port of entry by air to the BVI. It is the key link to
the remainder of the world for both visitors and residents.
1.2 In 1998
approximately 180,000 people entered the BVI by air. Of these 173,000 traveled through
Beef Island International airport. A similar number departed.
1.3 The airport has
received minor improvements over the years. However, the existing terminal building is no
more that 1,000 sq. m. in area. Given that the accepted design standard for terminal
buildings suggests that approximately 10 12 sq. m. of floor area is required per
passenger handled in the design hour, the existing building can comfortably handle no more
than 100 passengers per hour.
1.4 The airport
currently deals with one way flows in excess of 1,000 per day, with peaks of 150 per hour.
Hence there is serious under capacity.
1.5 The aircraft
parking apron is 13,000 sq. m. in area. During peak periods this becomes congested and
careful marshalling of aircraft is required.
1.6 The existing runway
is 1,115 metres long. During most of the year, this restricts the payload of the ATR 42
aircraft operated by the main airline operator, American Eagle, such that seats have to be
left unused. The runway length also restricts the choice of aircraft that operators may
wish to operate.
1.7 The airport
presently occupies approximately 35 hectares (86.5 acres) of Beef Island.
2. Components of
Phase 1 Expansion
2.1 The principal
objectives of the Phase 1 Development are to address the shortfalls in capacity identified
above, particularly in the areas of:
- Passenger handling capacity
- Aircraft parking
- Runway capacity
2.2 The airport area
has been increased by 23 hectares (56.5 acres) to 58 hectares. This includes 8 hectares
reclaimed by the filling of Conch Bay. The main directions of this expansion are to the
south to provide space for the new terminal building, car park and approach road, and to
the east for the extension of the runway.
2.3 The new passenger
terminal provides modern yet simple handling facilities for a peak hour passenger flow of
430 within approximately 4,300 sq. m. of floor area.
The building consists of a steel
structure on concrete foundations. The main roof consists of curved elements of 8.4 metres
each, with perforated steel profiled sheet decking, insulation and an aluminium profiled
covering.
Air conditioning is provided in the
offices and in the departure holding area.
Flight information is displayed on
TV monitors. A cafeteria and a racetrack type baggage reclaim conveyor are other
improvements over the existing terminal.
2.4 A separate cargo
building is included. This small building of 300 sq. m. floor area provides a facility to
handle air cargo and mail separately from the passenger handling. This allows the
passenger terminal to be designed for the specific purpose of passenger handling and the
cargo building for the more "industrial" needs of cargo.
2.5 A new access road
is needed to make way for the new taxiway and holding area at the runway end and to
provide access to the site of the new cargo building and the passenger terminal. This road
feeds to the terminal forecourt with 170 metres of set down space and a car park initially
for 150 private and rental cars and 40 taxis.
2.6 New incoming water
mains, electricity supplies and telephone services will be routed along the verges of the
new access road. All services will be underground.
2.7 Between the new
passenger terminal and the runway an enlarged aircraft parking apron is to be constructed.
This will provide 35,000 sq. m. of parking space; more than three times the size of the
existing apron. Up to eight 50/ 70 seat aircraft may be parked simultaneously with a
separate area for general aviation aircraft.
This apron is constructed partly
over the site of the existing passenger terminal and apron. This requires the apron to be
constructed in stages in order to keep space available for continuing operations
throughout the construction period.
2.8 The final element
of the Phase 1 Development is the improvement and extension of the runway. The runway is
to be extended by 300 m. by filling Conch Bay. This will provide a runway 1,415 m. (4,650
ft.) long that will permit unrestricted operation of the existing and slightly larger
aircraft.
The graded strip that contains the
runway is widened from 80 m. to 150 m. to comply with the international regulations
applicable to the extended runway length.
At the western end of the runway a
turning and holding loop is to be constructed. This will allow aircraft to be held clear
of the runway prior to take off to permit other aircraft to land. This arrangement enables
the runway to be used for a higher frequency of landings and take offs than would be the
case without this facility.
3. The procurement
process
3.1 The procurement
process commences with the development of a Master Plan. This identifies:
- The demand for facilities;
- The space requirement and optimum
location of components needed to meet the long term development;
- The timing of providing various
stages of development;
- The phased development towards the
ultimate development
3.2 Having established
the scope of work included in the first phase, preliminary layout plans are developed and
costed. A financial evaluation of the development is included, an environmental study
carried out and a business plan for the implementation of the phase completed.
3.3 Preliminary
discussions with funding agencies may be commenced at this stage or during the preliminary
design stage that follows.
3.4 A specialist
consultant is appointed to develop the scope of work identified in the Master Plan through
preliminary design to detail design and tender documents. At this stage it is important
for the user to identify a project co-ordinator to ensure that the consultant is clearly
briefed on the end users requirements in terms of project performance. It is at this stage
that clear definition of requirements is most effective in establishing that the correct
solution to the brief developed.
3.5 As part of the
design development the contract strategy is developed. The division of the work into
particular contract packages may be influenced by:
- Inclusion of specialist work in
separate contracts;
- Preference of donors to fund certain
elements of the project;
- Policy on involvement of available
local contracting resources;
3.6 Before the tender
documents are finalised the funding arrangements for the project should be agreed. Funding
agencies have particular requirements that may be attached to the use of funds made
available. These can include:
- Restriction on source of materials;
- Residency of contractors;
- Technical and financial capability
of contractors;
- Particular contract forms and tender
procedures.
All of these "conditions"
affect the structure of the contract documents and the method of tendering, evaluation and
award.
3.7 After approval of
the tender documents by the Government and funding agencies tenders are invited. After
receipt these are evaluated by a technical panel; a recommendation on award is made by the
Tender Board to EXCO and the contract is awarded.
3.8 Construction and
commissioning then proceeds in accordance with the contract timetable.
3.9 After hand over and
taking into use the contractor retains an obligation to repair any work that is shown to
be faulty in operation for a fixed period, usually twelve months, after hand over.
4. Management of
the Project
4.1 Various groups have
defined responsibilities in the delivery of the project. These groups include:
- The Employer (the BVI Government)
- The Employers Representative
(the Governments Project Manager)
- The Consultant (the
Governments engineering consultant NACO)
- The Contractors (various contractors
appointed through the procurement process).
4.2 The Employer represents the end user of the project. He is also responsible
for the provision, and eventual recovery, of the funds needed to construct the project.
Once the scope of work is defined and the contract strategy agreed the direct involvement
of the Employer in the management of the construction phase is limited to payment of
interim amounts due. The Employer may also be called upon to agree or disagree with
changes to the contract costs or time for completion.
4.3 The Employers Representative is appointed to provide a single point of reference
for the compliance of the Employer with his obligations under the contracts. These include
making the site of the works available at the time required, ensuring that other
contractors and utility suppliers that have interfaces meet their obligations, and
co-ordinating the final completion and commissioning so that the Employer takes over the
works in the manner intended.
The Employers Representative
does not instruct the contractors directly nor does he supervise the work or certify that
it has been satisfactorily completed.
4.4 The Engineer is responsible during the development stages for preparing the
designs and contract documents that define the Employers requirements. It is these
documents that provide the basis for contractors to bid for the work.
After award the Engineer is
appointed to manage the construction process on behalf of the Employer. It is the Engineer
that:
- Issues the order to commence the
construction work;
- Issues the working drawings and
specifications to the contractor;
- Inspects the work during
construction to ensure that it complies with his specifications;
- Agrees the regular measurement of
work completed and amounts due for payment to the contractor from time to time;
- Issues instructions to the
contractor to vary the work if required;
- Co-ordinates the interfaces between
the contractors where these occur;
- Inspects the work on completion and
certifies the hand over;
- Agrees with the contractor and
certifies the final amount due on completion.
It is through this procedure that
control of the quality, scope and cost of the work can be effectively controlled. The
Engineer maintains an independent position between the Employer and Contractor in matters
of contract performance, scope and cost.
4.5 The Contractor is responsible for constructing the work described in the
contract documents to the quality described in the specifications and within the time
period stated in the contract documents. The contract is usually awarded after a
competitive tender process. Provided that the Employer and the Engineer meet their
obligations under the contract to provide the facilities and information required by the
contractor to carry out the work, the Contractor is obliged to deliver the works
accordingly.
5. Current programme
and progress
5.1 Design work and
tender documents for most of the work packages have been completed. Tender documents for
specialist equipment such as baggage handling conveyors will proceed after award of the
main building contract.
5.2 Tenders have been
received for Package 1 Buildings and Package 2 Landside Infrastructure. The
two packages comprise approximately 40% of the total construction cost. Recommendations on
award are presently being placed before EXCO. The contracts should be awarded in the near
future.
5.3 The tender
documents for the runway extension are in final draft. After approval by the Government
and Caribbean Development Bank, tenders will be invited from selected specialist
contractors who have been pre-qualified. Tenders will be returned early in the new year
and the contract awarded by February 2000. With the award of this contract more than 80%
of the project will be in the construction stage.
5.4 During 2000 and
early 2001 when these three packages are running concurrently, construction work will be
proceeding at a rate of $2 million per month.
5.5 Other contracts for
the airside infrastructure, building equipment, landscaping, etc., will be tendered and
awarded throughout 2000 and early 2001.
5.6 It is expected that
the new terminal, its approach roads and car parks, and the extended runway will be
commissioned by July 2001. The last section of the new apron, to be completed after the
existing terminal is closed and demolished, will be completed by January 2002.
Attachments: Existing airport
layout
Airport layout after Phase 1 Development
New Passenger Terminal Floor Plan
New Passenger Terminal Elevations
Beef Island
International Airport
Phase 1 Developments
Funding Allocations
Element |
Outturn cost |
Funding source |
|
US$ millions |
EDF Grant |
EIB loan |
CDB loan |
Scotia loan |
BVISSB loan |
BVIG other funds |
| Package
1 - Buildings |
10.80 |
4.92 |
5.35 |
. |
. |
. |
0.53 |
| Packages
11/12/13 - Equipment |
0.70 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
0.70 |
| Miscellaneous
fitout |
0.40 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
0.40 |
| Package
2 - Landside Infrastructure |
5.50 |
. |
. |
. |
2.50 |
2.50 |
0.50 |
| Package
3 - Airside Infrastructure |
3.20 |
. |
. |
. |
0.75 |
1.95 |
0.50 |
| Phase
1B - Runway Extension |
15.00 |
. |
. |
15.00 |
. |
. |
0.00 |
| Utility
capital costs |
0.40 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
0.40 |
| Total construction costs |
36.00 |
4.92 |
5.35 |
15.00 |
3.25 |
4.45 |
3.03 |
| Airport
Management Study |
0.40 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
0.40 |
| Management
Team costs (local) |
0.30 |
. |
. . |
. |
. |
. |
0.30 |
| Design
and supervision (NACO) |
3.30 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
3.30 |
| Surveys |
0.30 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
0.30 |
| Total design, supervision and management |
4.30 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.30 |
| Land purchase |
10.7 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
10.7 |
| Total project cost |
51.00 |
4.92 |
5.35 |
15.00 |
3.25 |
4.45 |
18.03 |
| Total
grant funds |
. |
4.92 |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
| Total
external loans |
. |
. |
. |
20.35 |
. |
. |
. |
| Total
local loans |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
7.70 |
. |
| Total
BVIG funds |
. |
. . |
. |
. |
. |
. |
18.03 |
| Exchange rate for EDF/ EIB funds: Euro 1 = $1.07 |
|